Hi all, My question is a fairly simple one, but would appreciate opinons from the readers of this site. If the lender claims to have sent you everything that they have on file, but there are some key elements missing. Examples are(posted 8468 days ago)1) They have no details of advertising and marketing the property. 2)They are missing details of communications that they contend to have had with you or someone else about you. These communications are a constituant factor in their defense of their negligence).
I would assume that the lender is attempting to strengthen its position by saying that the borrower was being unhelpfull an unwilling by constantly asking for documents that the lender does not have.
What is the next move 1) Do you keep asking and look like a blithering idiot. or 2) point out that you don't see how they can justify their claim without such documents
Point 2 effectivly tells them that you are now at the point of refuting their claim and any beyond the point of requiring them to justify themselves anymore.
Once you get to this situation what should you do?