What are peoples opinions on the requirement for the lender to get a money order judgement after repossession has occured. When I spoke to Carol Riley of NAMV she was positive about it being needed in order for the shortfall to be pursued. HAs anyone used this as an arguement and has anyone been succesful. I have read that over 200 people have had the alleged debt written off by using this arguement.(posted 8549 days ago)I am trying to speak to Carol further about this but as yet she has not replied to my phone messages.
Any and all thoughts appreciated.