The result of this case is a very good step to fair justice-but sadly there is another case which is earlier than this were the lender and estate agent stated the house had been vandalised,so lowering the price-although it was proved that the borrower had already left the house and hence was not there -ie the vandalation took place after the premises had been checked and signed for and this was later agreed at an appeal hearing by a Circuit Judge-but still allowed the lower price to stand -making the Shortfall Higher.(posted 8674 days ago)This case i agree comes after that one but it still one excuse that can be used!
Charles Twford