I have to agree with Dave on this one. I'd rather submit my mediocre scores first and then build them afterwards (there is going to be a definite division here between the new and old players at MARP)(posted 9614 days ago)Secondly, the proposal doesn't solve anything. MARP has, what, 1400 games as of this time? It's fairly easy to find close to 50 games, that people either have few or bad scores on (I've located most of them already :) ) Therefore there's no guarantee that the people in the top 10 deserve to be. The system is great as it is now. If BBH can damn near finish 150 games, he deserves to be #1, and not me for finding 50 clones that nobody wants to play.