Response to interlaced vs progressive

The big question these days seems to be if *Canon's* progressive scan of 30 full resolution frames a second (though not a "true" progressive scan of 60 full frames a second) is better for film transfer than the traditional 60 fields a second.

The reason I mention this is that although I don't own a TRV-900, I've handled them at stores and talked to people who do own them, and, apparently, from my observations and the word on the street, Sony's progressive scan is only (a very jittery) 15fps. Basically, I think you'd be better off, just shooting normal video with the TRV-900.

Now if only someone could give us a solid answer on whether or not, Canon's progressive scan makes for a good film transfer...

DAve

[ Previous | Next ]